Case 1. United States v. Fred Massaro – Case
#006273, Honorable Paul Huck Presiding
Mr. Massaro was convicted of the first-degree murder of a woman found bound
in a trunk in the outskirts of the Everglades. He was charged in addition
with seventeen counts of RICO violations. Mr. Massaro was tested by Mr. Bierman
on the murder and called truthful in his denials of culpability in the murder.
At Mr. Massaro’s sentencing hearing, Mr. Bierman was called on by attorney
for the defendant, Fred Haddad, to testify to the results of the test and
did so. Following Mr. Bierman’s testimony, Mr. Haddad requested consideration
under “absolute innocence” findings.
Judge Huck dismissed the argument and sentenced Mr. Massaro to “life
in prison” on the murder. It was at this point Mr. Hernandez, a co-defendant
in the RICO portion of the indictment, rose and asked the court’s permission
to speak. Permission was granted. Mr. Hernandez then stated, “Your
honor, I did the woman (the murder). Massaro had nothing to do with it.”
Fred Massaro died in prison within a few months of his sentencing while an
appeal was pending.
Case 2. State of Florida v. Jose Zuniga, Case #F00-27588
and #F00-28042
Mr. Zuniga languished in jail for almost a year-and-a-half awaiting trial
on two armed robberies that occurred within fifteen minutes of each other.
He was tested by Mr. Bierman and found to be truthful in his denials of culpability
in the robberies. Following submission of the results Dade County State Attorney’s
Office asked to have their own examiner test the defendant.
This test was reported “deceptive to the relevant questions”.
A meeting between Mr. Bierman and the examiner for the State’s Attorney
to resolve the conflicting issue was held and the other examiner reviewed
Mr. Bierman’s test charts and concurred with his truthful findings.
The State Attorney’s examiner did, however, insist that his test was
accurate as well, as the defendant reacted deceptively to questions as to
“knowledge of who committed the robberies”. Mr. Bierman’s
response, “I did not test him on knowledge, I tested him on what he
was charged with – Armed Robbery – two counts, he denied it and
he was truthful to that”.
The State agreed. Charges dropped.
Case 3. State of Florida v. Nelson Del Rio, Case
#01-18395 CFA – Murder 1
Mr. Del Rio was tested by Mr. Bierman in accordance with a stipulated agreement.
He was charged with the first-degree murder of Jack Davidoff.
Mr. Del Rio’s initial examination was inconclusive and appeared to have
been intentionally distorted and he was so informed. A few days later, based
on an informant’s tip, notes that paralleled Doug Williams’ manual
of instructions on “How to Sting the Polygraph” were found in
his bunk beneath the mattress.
A second examination of Mr. Del Rio by Mr. Bierman indicated his truthfulness
in denying the murder, but Mr. Bierman opined that Mr. Del Rio was involved
with the disposal of the body.
Mr. Del Rio subsequently admitted his participation in the disposal and provided
evidence and testimony resulting in the conviction of Illidio Lindo in the
murder of Jack Davidoff.
Case 4. State of Florida v. John Doe (Names withheld
for obvious reasons)
In January 2004 a 31-year-old father was accused of capital sexual battery,
including vaginal penetration, of his eleven-year-old daughter. Examining
physicians at the Rape Treatment Center reported that the daughter’s
injuries were consistent with her complaint.
The father was tested (at the request of his attorney, Samuel Fields) on his
denials of perpetration and found by Mr. Bierman to be truthful. The daughter
making the allegations called the father’s defense attorney, Mr. Fields,
and left a seven-minute voice-mail message detailing how she had, with the
aid and use of a foreign object, performed penetration of herself causing
internal injuries. At a subsequent deposition the daughter repeated her tale
of self-infliction and her need for attention.
Charges in this case are expected to be dropped.
Case 5. State of Florida v. Nelson Serrano, Case # CF01-03262A-XX
Nelson Serrano was being tried as a mass murderer in Polk County, Florida. A polygraph examination offering exculpatory evidence was conducted and a Frye Hearing held to admit the polygraph examination. Mr. Bierman was engaged to offer a second opinion on the examination and following that to provide foundation testimony for the admissibility of the polygraph test. During the foundation hearing word came down to investigators that an individual already in custody in Tennessee had admitted to the four slayings.
Case 6. United States v. Tyrone Young, Case #04-20809-CR-KING
Mr. Young was arrested and charged with Post Office robbery. He was identified
by an eyewitness employee of the post office and he had a history of similar
offenses. Mr. Young was tested by Mr. Bierman in regard to the Post Office
robbery and found to be truthful in his denials of participation. A second
concurring opinion was provided Jason Kreiss, attorney for Mr. Young, who
proffered this information to both the judge and the FBI. Judge King, influenced
in part or in whole by the polygraph, dismissed further proceedings. Several
months later someone else was arrested and convicted of the robbery.
100
South Pine Island Road
Suite 128
Plantation, FL 33324
954-476-9200
305-822-9395